Do students really need “natural” English?

Like “progressive”, “job creators”, “hard working families” and “pro-choice”, it is very hard to argue with something “natural”. Use other terms, though, (“left winger”, “capitalist”, “middle class” and “pro-abortion”) and you get something that plenty of people still agree with but others might have an issue with. Ditto with “natural” in English teaching book titles etc.

“Not natural” seems to usually mean “perfectly understandable, but not what a native English speaker would say” making “natural” something like “more like a British or American person”. That’s still relevant given the continuing influence of those countries’ arts, media etc on the language, but hardly the priority for the majority of our students who find understanding and being understood the main issue.

This entry was posted in Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a comment (link optional and email never shared)

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.